Re: systemd bug closed - next steps?
Le 23/09/2014 20:46, Brian a écrit :
> On Tue 23 Sep 2014 at 19:30:34 +0200, Erwan David wrote:
>
>> Compare it to to a init system which is the main reason to choose a
>> desktop environment...
>>
>> See
>> http://www.webupd8.org/2014/09/debian-switches-back-to-gnome-from-xfce.html
>>
>>
>> So sytemd does in fact orient *everything*. You are not "integrated"
>> into systemd, I am not sure debian will still be for you.
>>
>> That's the worse behaviuour of the worst commercial software vendor :
>> wanting to lock usrers into what the vendor choose and denying them
>> freedom to choose.
> You do not like that systemd will be the default init system for Jessie.
> Tough. Exercise your choice not to have it. Or is easier to moan rather
> than just get on with using sysvinit?
>
> As for your link, you could at least have quoted a primary source, the
> mail from Joey Hess making the announcement. That way people could judge
> for themselves rather than relying on your inconsequential remarks.
>
>
That's just not the behaviour of _something meant to be a "default" with
options.
First, we see that other packages become dependant on it, making the
"option" thing somewhat irrelevant.
Next, other choices are done because of "integration" with systemd.
Why ? why integration with a mere default choice among other choices
woud be relevant ?
Except if the agenda is *not* what was sold and agreed upon which was a
mere *default*.
Sorry, but this kind of things just make suspicious.
What will next step be ?
Reply to: