Re: Query about existence of way to free up unnecessary RAM usage
On Wednesday 10 September 2014 19:42:57 Martin Read wrote:
> On 10/09/14 18:07, Curt wrote:
> > Then why do the (net)installer(s) apply an obsolete principle when you
> > accept a/the default partioning scheme(s) (well, at least the Squeeze
> > netinstaller I used way back when did so).
>
> My first guess would be "because it's not so bad an idea that anyone in
> a position to change it cares about changing it".
Anyway, that was a long time ago. What about Jessie?
Lisi
Reply to: