Re: End of hypocrisy ?
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Bob Proulx <bob@proulx.com> wrote:
> Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>> Joel Rees wrote:
>>>
>>> This is precisely why systemd should have been brought up to speed in
>>> a separate, parallel, volunteer-only distro.
>>>
>>> (If you don't understand what I mean by a separate, parallel,
>>> volunteer-only distribution, think of kfreebsd, but a little closer to
>>> home.)
>>>
>>> I'd still say there's time for debian to go for a course correction,
>>
>> Seriously?
>>
>> What is sid for?
>
> I believe the point was that it should be "make before break". They
> should have allowed people to use systemd without preventing people
> from not using it. They didn't make a new system without breaking the
> old one. They broke the old one while trying to build the new one.
> That is the problem. You shouldn't burn down your old house while you
> are still designing and building your new house.
Had Gnome not had to rely on systemd as pid 1, we might not have had a
CTTE bug, etc.
Reply to: