Re: I'm not a huge fan of systemd
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On 07/07/2014 03:48 PM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Du, 06 iul 14, 11:15:14, The Wanderer wrote:
>>
>> (As far as I can tell, logind itself exists only as the binary
>> 'systemd-logind', which is packaged as part of the systemd package
>> rather than in its own logind or systemd-logind package. The same
>> sort of thing appears to be true of journald, hostnamed, localed,
>> shutdownd, and timedated, the latter four of which I hadn't even
>> heard of. That's another aspect of the "can't get one without the
>> others" factor which is what leads people to describe systemd as
>> monolithic.)
>
> Please...
>
> $ dpkg-query --show --showformat='${Installed-Size}\n' coreutils
> 13001
> $ dpkg -L coreutils | grep -c /bin/
> 102
Unless I'm much mistaken, none of the tools provided by coreutils are
daemons, and none of them are init systems. Both of those things are
qualitative differences.
I didn't mention any of the non-daemon tools provided by the systemd
package, for that exact reason.
- --
The Wanderer
Secrecy is the beginning of tyranny.
A government exists to serve its citizens, not to control them.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=Tx5w
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: