Re: PuTTY SSH client security

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: PuTTY SSH client security
From: Virgo Pärna <virgo.parna@mail.ee>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 12:14:31 +0000 (UTC)
Message-id: <[🔎] slrnlrvl97.65f.virgo.parna@dragon.gaiasoft.ee>
References: <[🔎] CACJnc4hFayRNmQzK6rHJP9_Bp204ZuY0VtuFH400fZr32Ni9DQ@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20140710092449.GA9911@darac.org.uk>

On Thu, 10 Jul 2014 10:24:50 +0100, Darac Marjal <mailinglist@darac.org.uk> wrote:
>
> PuTTY is *not* based on OpenSSL[1], so it has never been susceptible to
> the heartbleed bug.
>

    And even if it were based on OpenSSL, it would not have  been suspectible to
heartbleed bug, because ssh protocol was not suspectible to it.

-- 
Virgo Pärna 
virgo.parna@mail.ee

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PuTTY SSH client security
  - From: Stephen Powell <zlinuxman@wowway.com>

References:
- PuTTY SSH client security
  - From: Kitty Cat <realizar.la.paz@gmail.com>
- Re: PuTTY SSH client security
  - From: Darac Marjal <mailinglist@darac.org.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: Where to put start-up and shutdown code from `man 4 random`?
Next by Date: Re: I'm not a huge fan of systemd
Previous by thread: Re: PuTTY SSH client security
Next by thread: Re: PuTTY SSH client security
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread