Re: Will Iceweasel stay open source?
Heh. If you missed my sarcasm below, more power to you.
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 3:24 AM, Ric Moore <wayward4now@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 05/16/2014 08:55 AM, Joel Rees wrote:
>>
>> Okay, I take it back.
>>
>> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 9:43 PM, Joel Rees <joel.rees@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Scott, you're not adding anything to the conversation, either.
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 3:27 AM, Scott Ferguson
>>> <scott.ferguson.debian.user@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> [something about something called "Fffflash" that may or may not be
>>>> relevant to something]
:-/
>> It was just the one post whose content I deleted that didn't add
>> anything to the conversation. (Well, and one or two previous posts).
>>
>> Good on you staying up some more when you needed the sleep, and sorry
>> for the censure.
>
>
> "censure"? Did we miss something? Ric
Basically, my timing was a bit late, Scott had shifted from the attack
already and was showing why the technical concerns were groundless.
The political context issues remain unaddressed; I am still debating
whether to point out that TPP is succeeding where ACTA hit the wall,
and drawing the connection to the DCMA.
--
Joel Rees
Conspiracy?
Sure there are conspiracies.
As long as there are people stupid enough
to think they are smarter than the rest of us,
there will be conspiracies.
http://reiisi.blogspot.jp/2011/10/conspiracy-theories.html
Reply to: