Re: apt-pinning, strange behavior
On Wed, 09 Oct 2013 00:12:46 +0200
berenger.morel@neutralite.org wrote:
>
>
> Le 08.10.2013 22:42, Sven Joachim a écrit :
> > On 2013-10-08 19:06 +0200, berenger.morel@neutralite.org wrote:
> >
> >> Since I had to reinstall from my last kernel error, I decided to
> >> stay
> >> with stable on that computer, but I need some softwares in less
> >> outdated versions, like development libraries or i3 ( this one is
> >> not
> >> a need but a question of comfort, I admit ), so I want to use
> >> apt-pining.
> >>
> >> I have set all packages from stable to a priority of 900 and testing
> >> packages with 500.
> >> But tzdata wants to upgrade, for an unknown reason. Explicitly
> >> making
> >> it to a priority of 900 for stable fixes that, but I can not
> >> understand why it is needed?
> >
> > I don't know either, but "apt-cache policy tzdata" should explain it.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Sven
>
> Thanks for the hint, I had forgotten about apt-cache policy.
> I finally understood, why the update was on the run:
>
> tzdata:
> Installé : 2013d-0wheezy1
> Candidat : 2013d-1
> Table de version :
> 2013d-1 0
> 500 http://ftp2.fr.debian.org/debian/ testing/main amd64
> Packages
> *** 2013d-0wheezy1 0
> 500 http://ftp2.fr.debian.org/debian/ stable-updates/main amd64
> Packages
> 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
> 2013c-0wheezy1 0
> 900 http://ftp2.fr.debian.org/debian/ stable/main amd64
> Packages
>
> Version 2013d-0wheezy1 had the same priority as testing one so testing
> was installed because more recent.
> Now, I wonder why I have 3 versions of that package listed when I only
> have 2 sources enabled? Could it be because of stable, stable/updates
> and stable-updates repositories? ( I am not used to stable, so I do not
> have the "updates" repos usually )
> And also why I have a wheezy version with a priority of 500... I can
> not even find the 2013d-0wheezy1 in debian packages...
>
>
The answer to your question is in files /var/lib/apt/lists/*_Release.
You can notice the difference:
Suite: stable
Suite: stable-updates
Reply to: