VPN failure
Trying to trace why a vpn connection on Wheezy 64b is failing immediately.
IPv4 settings - Automatic (VPN) addresses only
DNS Servers - 2 specified
Search domains - specified (same as used on other systems which work)
VPN settings
Gateway, User name, User password, Group Name, Group password - all
specified (same as used on other systems which work)
Use hybrid authentication is checked (although I'm not quite sure if I
checked this or if it is default).
CA file: None
Advanced settings -
Domain - empty
Vendor - Cisco
Encryption - Secure
NAT - NAT-T When available
IKE DH Group - DH Group 2
Perfect Forward Secrecy (Server)
Disable dead peer connection - unchecked
a tail on syslog shows -
Sep 4 12:33:03 Nebo NetworkManager[2933]: <info> VPN service 'vpnc'
appeared; activating connections
Sep 4 12:33:03 Nebo NetworkManager[2933]: <info> VPN plugin state
changed: starting (3)
Sep 4 12:33:03 Nebo NetworkManager[2933]: <info> VPN connection
'OSC_PROD' (Connect) reply received.
Sep 4 12:33:03 Nebo NetworkManager[2933]: SCPlugin-Ifupdown: devices
added (path: /sys/devices/virtual/net/tun0, iface: tun0)
Sep 4 12:33:03 Nebo NetworkManager[2933]: SCPlugin-Ifupdown: device
added (path: /sys/devices/virtual/net/tun0, iface: tun0): no ifupdown
configuration found.
Sep 4 12:33:03 Nebo avahi-daemon[2832]: Withdrawing workstation service
for tun0.
Sep 4 12:33:03 Nebo NetworkManager[2933]: SCPlugin-Ifupdown: devices
removed (path: /sys/devices/virtual/net/tun0, iface: tun0)
Sep 4 12:33:03 Nebo NetworkManager[2933]: <warn> VPN plugin failed: 1
Sep 4 12:33:03 Nebo NetworkManager[2933]: <info> VPN plugin state
changed: stopped (6)
Sep 4 12:33:03 Nebo NetworkManager[2933]: <info> VPN plugin state
change reason: 0
Sep 4 12:33:03 Nebo NetworkManager[2933]: <warn> error disconnecting
VPN: Could not process the request because no VPN connection was active.
Any input is, as always, greatly appreciated.
--
Regards
Jack
Boston Tea Party, Coercive Acts, Powder Alarm, Revolution
Lessons (Mistakes) not learned are bound to be repeated.
Reply to: