Re: dpkg-query - package "un"packed, no version ???
On 2013-09-02, Tom H <tomh0665@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> AFAICT, the "un" output of "-l" for vim-athena is because it's listed
> in the "Recommends" field of vim-common, so it's recognized as a
> package.
It seems to me, from what I can discern on my own system, that you
obtain the 'un' output in the initial field when there is no description
available for the package.
Or is that completely stupid? Am I confusing the cause with the effect?
Reply to: