[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: apt-get upgrade problem with libenchant1c2a



Sharon Kimble wrote:
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 12:17:15 -0500
Hugo Vanwoerkom <hvw59601@care2.com> wrote:

Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
David Goodenough wrote:
I have a sacrificial machine that I keep upto date with sid every
morning.  Yesterday and today I get an error:-
Calculating upgrade... Failed
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
 libenchant1c2a : Depends: aspell-en but it is not going to be
installed or myspell-dictionary or
                           aspell-dictionary or
                           ispell-dictionary or
                           hunspell-dictionary
                  Recommends: enchant but it is not going to be
installed E: Error, pkgProblemResolver::Resolve generated
breaks, this may be >>> caused by held packages.
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree    But apt-cache policy libenchant1c2a
says:-

  Installed: 1.6.0-10
  Candidate: 1.6.0-10

so it should not need upgrading at all.

Also aspell-en is installed.

Is this related to Ubuntu bug  #1096669?  There is nothing in >>>
bugs.debian.org that seems to fit the bill.

Any ideas?
I get that with dist-upgrade and not with upgrade. Googling the
error >> it seems that doing upgrade will resolve that. But I
haven't tried that!

when I do 'aptitude why' on that file, I get that it is a
dependency of > k3b, which is part of the upgrade. What happens
if you do 'why'?
see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=721130
Hugo

Hugo.
Please adjust you're posting style as it is impossible to read what
you're saying as its indistinguishable from the rest of the
conversation. It just appears that you're signing the email without any
content, which cant be true!


sorry about that! I post through tbird + this is what I see:
http://uppix.com/f-00_posting_tbird521e4f570013cc30.jpg
and this is what I see through gmane:
http://uppix.com/f-00_posting_gmane521e4de40013cc1d.jpg
so I see no problems :-(

Hugo


Reply to: