[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: apt-get upgrade problem with libenchant1c2a



On Wednesday 28 Aug 2013, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> > Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> >> David Goodenough wrote:
> >>> I have a sacrificial machine that I keep upto date with sid every
> >>> morning.  Yesterday and today I get an error:-
> >>> 
> >>> Calculating upgrade... Failed
> >>> 
> >>> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> >>>  libenchant1c2a : Depends: aspell-en but it is not going to be
> >>> 
> >>> installed or
> >>> 
> >>>                            myspell-dictionary or
> >>>                            aspell-dictionary or
> >>>                            ispell-dictionary or
> >>>                            hunspell-dictionary
> >>>                   
> >>>                   Recommends: enchant but it is not going to be
> >>> 
> >>> installed
> >>> E: Error, pkgProblemResolver::Resolve generated breaks, this may be
> >>> caused by held packages.
> >>> Reading package lists... Done
> >>> Building dependency tree    But apt-cache policy libenchant1c2a says:-
> >>> 
> >>>   Installed: 1.6.0-10
> >>>   Candidate: 1.6.0-10
> >>> 
> >>> so it should not need upgrading at all.
> >>> 
> >>> Also aspell-en is installed.
> >>> 
> >>> Is this related to Ubuntu bug  #1096669?  There is nothing in
> >>> bugs.debian.org
> >>> that seems to fit the bill.
> >>> 
> >>> Any ideas?
> >> 
> >> I get that with dist-upgrade and not with upgrade. Googling the error
> >> it seems that doing upgrade will resolve that. But I haven't tried that!
> > 
> > when I do 'aptitude why' on that file, I get that it is a dependency of
> > k3b, which is part of the upgrade. What happens if you do 'why'?
> 
> see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=721130
> 
> Hugo
I am using apt-get not aptitude, and I don't think apt-get has a why option.
But I will follow the bug with interest.

Thanks

David


Reply to: