Sven Joachim:
> On 2013-07-18 17:38 +0200, Jochen Spieker wrote:
>
>> David Guntner:
>>>
>>> Running 6.0.7. This morning, I did an aptitude update, followed by:
>>>
>>>> # aptitude safe-upgrade
>>>> Resolving dependencies...
>>>> The following packages will be REMOVED:
>>>> libwine{u} libwine-alsa{u} libwine-cms{u} libwine-gl{u} libwine-gphoto2{u} libwine-ldap{u} libwine-print{u}
>>>> libwine-sane{u} wine{u} wine-bin{u} wine-utils{u}
>>
>> Wow. So much for the "safe" in "safe-upgrade". Looks like a reason to
>> ditch aptitude.
>
> Absolutely not, the correct thing is to run "aptitude unmarkauto wine".
> Removing unused packages automatically is usually what you want.
Thanks, you are right. I missed the {u} flags.
J.
--
Scientists know what they are talking about.
[Agree] [Disagree]
<http://www.slowlydownward.com/NODATA/data_enter2.html>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature