Sven Joachim: > On 2013-07-18 17:38 +0200, Jochen Spieker wrote: > >> David Guntner: >>> >>> Running 6.0.7. This morning, I did an aptitude update, followed by: >>> >>>> # aptitude safe-upgrade >>>> Resolving dependencies... >>>> The following packages will be REMOVED: >>>> libwine{u} libwine-alsa{u} libwine-cms{u} libwine-gl{u} libwine-gphoto2{u} libwine-ldap{u} libwine-print{u} >>>> libwine-sane{u} wine{u} wine-bin{u} wine-utils{u} >> >> Wow. So much for the "safe" in "safe-upgrade". Looks like a reason to >> ditch aptitude. > > Absolutely not, the correct thing is to run "aptitude unmarkauto wine". > Removing unused packages automatically is usually what you want. Thanks, you are right. I missed the {u} flags. J. -- Scientists know what they are talking about. [Agree] [Disagree] <http://www.slowlydownward.com/NODATA/data_enter2.html>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature