I enjoyed very much to read your previous post, but here I'll have to disagree. Debian aims to be a universal operating system, but this is to some point contradictory with the pace of computer architecture innovation, which is not at all controlled by free software community, but self imposed as a "natural pace" of technological development disregarding all social issues in this "run to faster" and the constant cycle of trashing good piece of hardware. Debian is great because it strives and grows despite these difficulties and brings us somewhat "outdated" software that behaves great and respects us. Not because it is the most bleeding edge of technological enhancement. I'm not saying we shouldn't move. But as I see, the question to move is basically different to different kinds of computer use and developers shouldn't blame people for not rushing to upgrades. Said developers should question why their push wasn't seen as primary issue as they first thought it was. -- Luther Blisset GNUPG/PGP KEY: 6722CF80 I challenge you to play the game in which there is no loser but everything is fun and worthwhile!
--- Begin Message ---
- To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Switching to 64 bit
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@hardwarefreak.com>
- Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2013 20:20:09 -0500
- Message-id: <51CF87C9.9020708@hardwarefreak.com>
- Reply-to: stan@hardwarefreak.com
- In-reply-to: <51CF671E.9050108@optonline.net>
- References: <51CCD4CE.5010507@videotron.ca> <51CCFB5F.8080205@hardwarefreak.com> <51CDE8BB.90100@videotron.ca> <51CE7910.8000309@hardwarefreak.com> <51CF61FB.6040306@videotron.ca> <51CF671E.9050108@optonline.net>
On 6/29/2013 6:00 PM, Doug wrote: > So why have we been > bamboozled into running 64 bits if there is no advantage? There are many reasons. One is priming the pump. At some point in the future applications are predicted to become so content rich (bloated) that individual application processes will require more than 2GB of address space. Moving to 64 bit now gets everyone ready. Another is the desire of developers to eventually dump the 32 bit x86 instruction set altogether. Those who write the memory management code disdain the segmented addressing scheme of x86. x86-64 provides a much flatter memory model which is easier to program. Those who maintain complete distros, such as Debian, would surely appreciate building ~30,000 binary packages instead of ~60,000, and tracking/fixing bugs in only one of these instead of both, etc. To name a few. -- Stan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51CF87C9.9020708@hardwarefreak.com
--- End Message ---
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part