Re: Debian 7

[Glenn English <ghe@slsware.com>]

On Feb 22, 2013, at 10:22 PM, Chris Bannister wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 11:28:36PM -0600, Mark Allums wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 08:51:17PM +0100, berenger.morel@neutralite.org
>>> wrote:
>>>> Some people will say that unstable is better for security issues,
>>>> because it is harder to exploit flaws when the software changes
>>>> constantly.
>>> 
>>> Really??? They obviously don't understand the meaning of stable. (Hint,
>>> it doesn't mean unlikely to crash.)
>> 
>> It has two meanings for us, and one determines which is meant by context.
> 
> Right. Debian stable doesn't mean unlikely to crash. It's the original
> meaning, too BTW.

Maybe the Debian stable is where the developers keep their horses...

Take a look at:
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-faq/ch-ftparchives

-- 
Glenn English