Re: Debian 7

[Chris Bannister <cbannister@slingshot.co.nz>]

On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 11:28:36PM -0600, Mark Allums wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 08:51:17PM +0100, berenger.morel@neutralite.org
> > wrote:
> > > Some people will say that unstable is better for security issues,
> > > because it is harder to exploit flaws when the software changes
> > > constantly.
> > 
> > Really??? They obviously don't understand the meaning of stable. (Hint,
> > it doesn't mean unlikely to crash.)
> 
> It has two meanings for us, and one determines which is meant by context.

Right. Debian stable doesn't mean unlikely to crash. It's the original
meaning, too BTW.

-- 
"If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people
who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the 
oppressing." --- Malcolm X