Re: [OT] Posting styles
- To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: [OT] Posting styles
- From: Indulekha <indulekha@theunworthy.com>
- Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2012 15:49:09 -0500
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20120407204909.GA5025@radhesyama>
- In-reply-to: <iNJO1-3wi-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
- References: <iL36y-8gE-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <iL3zz-JS-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <iMddv-3Kb-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <iMesV-60t-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <iNmop-6c0-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <iNn18-7nN-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <iNpvY-3i6-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <iNz2h-2mX-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <iNzYl-3XC-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <iNJO1-3wi-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In linux.debian.user, Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org> wrote:
>
> Wayne Topa wrote:
>> Who would want to spoof YOUR Mail.
>>=20
>> I have been on this list for 19 years now and do not recall anyone being
>> spoofed. From the tenor of your mails, I doubt anyone would gain
>> anything from it.
>
> This is fallacious, dangerous, and probably insulting thinking.
>
> I'm sure that many people on this list are eg, sysadmins for large or
> important installations. Or perhaps they are researchers,
> decision-makers, free software developers, or any of a myriad of
> other important things.
>
> If you're at least some of the time sending mail that is important to be
> reliably attributed to you, it *absolutely* makes sense to sign that
> mail.
Yeah, but to a *mailing* *list* ??? I think not...
> If you're signing some mail, you might as well sign all of it, as
> this will habituate people to expect your mail to be signed, and avoid
> you needing to decide what's important enough to sign. It also acts as a
> nice signal that you can handle encrypted mail, which needs to be used
> more widely.
>
So, since I sometimes need big, thigh high rubber boots to keep my feet and
legs dry and clean, I should just wear my big rubber boots everywhere all
time then, right? That way whether I'm at the grocery store, the office, or
the barn there'll be no worries. :D
Seriously, when people sign every mail with a key (or request email return
receipts) they're either saying "look how cool *I* am", or "my desire to
$[express my geekiness | indulge my paranoia] trumps your wish to simply
read email".
Besides, if everyone signed all mail it'd be a very short matter of time
til the means to spoof any gpg/pgp key would appear.
If you and I work together on a secret project for a defense contractor,
or in banking or something it makes senseto sign business-related emails
to one another. For casual communication it's just madness.
Of course, that's merely my opinion. :)
--
❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤
Indulekha
Reply to: