Re: wheezy update
I have got the error, it came after installing anon-proxy.
thanks
Am 26.08.2012 18:05, schrieb Camaleón:
> On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 11:49:57 -0400, Gary Dale wrote:
>
>> On 26/08/12 11:19 AM, Mika Suomalainen wrote:
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA512
>>>
>>> 26.08.2012 15:02, Dirk Hombrecher kirjoitti:
>>>> I have tried deb http://http.debian.net/debian wheezy main contrib
>>>> non-free,
>>>>
>>>> still error Error http://http.debian.net wheezy Release.gpg Connection
>>>> failed
>>> Do you have network connection? Try "ping -c 5 google.com" and send the
>>> output.
>>>
>>> If you have network connection, then I don't have any idea what causes
>>> that.
>>>
>> I'm not sure where the http://http.debian.net/debian came from.
> It comes from here:
>
> http://http.debian.net/
>
> It's a mirror redirector.
>
> >From a browser, you should use (with a "slash" at the end of the URI):
>
> http://http.debian.net/debian/
> ^
>
>> Most mirrors are in the form ftp.??.debian.org/debian, where the ?? are
>> the country code.
> That's the nomeclature for the usual redirector (cdn) but this is a
> different one.
>
>> I can't ping the http.debian.net url either and I have a working
>> Internet connection.
> There must be something at your side because it works fine from here:
>
> sm01@stt008:~$ ping -c 3 http.debian.net
> PING http.debian.net (174.142.22.90) 56(84) bytes of data.
> 64 bytes from ghost.puffinhost.com (174.142.22.90): icmp_seq=1 ttl=49 time=112 ms
> 64 bytes from ghost.puffinhost.com (174.142.22.90): icmp_seq=2 ttl=49 time=114 ms
> 64 bytes from ghost.puffinhost.com (174.142.22.90): icmp_seq=3 ttl=49 time=123 ms
>
> --- http.debian.net ping statistics ---
> 3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2006ms
> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 112.028/116.784/123.951/5.172 ms
>
>> Try using a normal mirror url after testing to make sure you can ping
>> google.com or some other well known site to ensure you have a working
>> Internet connection.
> Checking Internet access and "ping" is the first thing the OP should have
> checked...
>
> Greetings,
>
Reply to: