Brian wrote: > Miga wrote: > > Basically what I'm asking is, can somebody help me confirm that > > redeclipse-data is actually non-free? If so, what's making it non-free? > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=651752 Stated in that ITP log: > This will go in non-free due to missing "sources" (and not due to licensing). Bob
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature