Re: Is redeclipse really non-free?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Is redeclipse really non-free?
From: Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 23:09:00 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20120825220900.GA27914@desktop>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] CAN7i45EbZ2SPy52sMvR+FCnA17Gioar4WY92nWWJN8-qanXRpA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] CAN7i45EbZ2SPy52sMvR+FCnA17Gioar4WY92nWWJN8-qanXRpA@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat 25 Aug 2012 at 14:22:06 -0700, Miga wrote:

> Basically what I'm asking is, can somebody help me confirm that
> redeclipse-data is actually non-free? If so, what's making it non-free?

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=651752

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is redeclipse really non-free?
  - From: Bob Proulx <bob@proulx.com>

References:
- Is redeclipse really non-free?
  - From: Miga <miga-anyandall@hotmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Is redeclipse really non-free?
Next by Date: Re: debootstrap fails
Previous by thread: Re: Is redeclipse really non-free?
Next by thread: Re: Is redeclipse really non-free?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread