[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
] [
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
] [
Date Index
] [
Thread Index
]
Re: Is redeclipse really non-free?
To
:
debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject
: Re: Is redeclipse really non-free?
From
: John Hasler <
jhasler@newsguy.com
>
Date
: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 17:05:28 -0500
Message-id
: <
[🔎]
87vcg6k4pj.fsf@thumper.dhh.gt.org
>
Reply-to
:
john@dhh.gt.org
(John Hasler)
In-reply-to
: <
[🔎]
CAN7i45EbZ2SPy52sMvR+FCnA17Gioar4WY92nWWJN8-qanXRpA@mail.gmail.com
> (Miga's message of "Sat, 25 Aug 2012 14:22:06 -0700")
References
: <
[🔎]
CAN7i45EbZ2SPy52sMvR+FCnA17Gioar4WY92nWWJN8-qanXRpA@mail.gmail.com
>
The OFL (Open Font License) is incompatible with the DFSG. -- John Hasler
Reply to:
debian-user@lists.debian.org
John Hasler (on-list)
John Hasler (off-list)
References
:
Is redeclipse really non-free?
From:
Miga <miga-anyandall@hotmail.com>
Prev by Date:
Is redeclipse really non-free?
Next by Date:
Re: Is redeclipse really non-free?
Previous by thread:
Is redeclipse really non-free?
Next by thread:
Re: Is redeclipse really non-free?
Index(es):
Date
Thread