Re: [OT] Intelectual Property Law [WAS: Re: what graphic card to buy?]

[Celejar <celejar@gmail.com>]

On Fri, 3 Aug 2012 00:59:08 +0300
Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mi, 01 aug 12, 20:23:35, Celejar wrote:
> > On Wed, 1 Aug 2012 19:45:27 +0300
> > Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Mi, 01 aug 12, 00:59:29, Yaro Kasear wrote:
> > > > On 07/31/2012 01:42 PM, Celejar wrote:
> > > > >On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 10:30:50 +0300
> > > > >Andrei POPESCU<andreimpopescu@gmail.com>  wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >>On Jo, 19 iul 12, 22:50:25, Celejar wrote:
> > > > >>>Quite true - and completely irrelevant to my point. I don't deny that
> > > > >>>money can be made with FLOSS, just that it's pointless to try to sell
> > > > >>>copies of one's software if it's freely copyable. The examples you give
> > > > >>>are all of models other than the straightforward sale of licenses or
> > > > >>>copies.
> > > > >>IMO a business model that relies on the possibility to sell copies that
> > > > >>basically cost nothing to produce is broken.
> > > > >Is this a moral claim, a business one, a legal one, or just plain dogma?
> > 
> > [The line to which you are responding is mine, not Yaro's.]
> 
> Yes I know, and I thought the levels of quoting show that, or don't 
> they?

They do - but the first quote in your message was Yaro's. I guess you
decided to respond to a quote of mine as cited in his email, instead of
responding directly to my email. In such a case, I generally delete the
first name in the chain, but I admit that I don't know if that's the
Right Way To Do It.

Celejar