Re: the ghost of UEFI and Micr0$0ft
On 06/06/12 13:35, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> * On 2012 05 Jun 21:45 -0500, Christofer C. Bell wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Nate Bargmann <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>>> Again, let MS rot in its malware hell. �I don't care!
I'm all right Jack....
<snipped rabid rant>
>> Comments like this make you look like a tool. Microsoft is acting as
>> as nothing more than a certificate authority here. This has jack and
>> all to do with MS Windows.
Don't go bringing facts to a passion play.... ;-p
> I'd much rather be a "tool" standing up for computing freedom than a
> lacky buying into the marketing spin.
There are other, intelligent, alternatives to your binary view of the
;don't confuse Intel with Microsoft
;do your own research instead of stupidly swallowing the first "blog"
that feeds your paranoia
;consider that Fedora paid the $99 fee - in a free world that would be
;consider also that Fedora has *not* said they won't be sharing the key
Iceweasel/Firefox/Chrome/Chromium/Iceape/IE extensions for finding
answers to questions about Debian:-