Re: the ghost of UEFI and Micr0$0ft
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Nate Bargmann <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Again, let MS rot in its malware hell. I don't care! Perhaps if MS had
> been a bit more proactive a couple of decades ago we would not be having
> this discussion. MSFT issues are not for us in the Debian or wider
> Linux community to resolve.
Comments like this make you look like a tool. Microsoft is acting as
as nothing more than a certificate authority here. This has jack and
all to do with MS Windows.
> If need be, community oriented hardware based on ARM and such will
> become the order of the day for general purpose computer. Consumer
> hardware is being made off-limits to the hobbyist.
You can't disable the code signing requirement on ARM.