On 25.05.2012 15:49, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 17:37 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: >> deb http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates main >> deb-src http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates main >> deb http://backports.debian.org/debian-backports squeeze-backports main >> deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian sid main > > You're issue is related to the sid repository. If you need something > from sid, then uncomment it and after that comment it. Don't feel secure > using pinning. > > You can name the repositories "stable" instead of "squeeze", so it will > use "stable" what ever Debian "stable" is named. > > Is it safe to use "stable" instead of "squeeze"? Are there usually any conflicts or anything what would need "full-upgrade" whenever new "stable" is named? I am asking just for curiosity, I am Sid user. -- [Mika Suomalainen](https://mkaysi.github.com/) || [gpg --keyserver pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-keys 4DB53CFE82A46728](http://mkaysi.github.com/PGP/key.txt) || [Why do I sign my emails?](http://mkaysi.github.com/PGP/WhyDoISignEmails.html) || [Please don't send HTML.](http://mkaysi.github.com/articles/complaining/HTML.html) || [Please don't toppost](http://mkaysi.github.com/articles/complaining/topposting.html) || [This signature](https://gist.github.com/2643070) ||
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature