Re: gpg/pgp noise
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 12:20:08PM +0300, Mika Suomalainen wrote:
> 09.05.2012 11:56, Jon Dowland kirjoitti:
> > On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 12:29:31PM +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> >> Bob's PGP signature is valid - yours is not
> >> You waste our time and bandwidth.
> >
> > In what way? I can verify Mika's signatures just fine. The signatures
> > are valid.
> >
> >> Bob's key validates his identity - yours does not.
> >> I can verify that "Bob" is "Bob" through a chain of trust.
> >
> > Why does Mikka's not? It's not impossible for someone to have a trust
> > path to Mikka. Albeit one step removed, since the signing key he uses
> > has one signature, from another of his keys - but that one has at
> > least one. (I haven't managed to construct a trust path to Mikka
> > myself, since most of the public pathfinder servers don't have his
> > key)
> >
> >
>
> Because nobody else near Kotka, Finland uses PGP and the nearest CAcert
> assurers are after 110KMs from me.
>
> PS. I am back to weird long signatures. I won't comment to this thread
> anymore nor to anything else which I haven't written in my signature or
> elsewhere.
>
Bye.
--
❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤
Indulekha
Reply to: