Re: gpg/pgp noise
On 09/05/12 19:39, Jon Dowland wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 07:20:15PM +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>> On 09/05/12 18:56, Jon Dowland wrote:
>>> In what way? I can verify Mika's signatures just fine. The signatures
>>> are valid.
>>
>> All his posts?
>> Is cutting and pasting a hobby?
>> Do you between "some" and "all"?
>
> The ones I've bothered to verify
Most of his original ones did not verify.
>, via '|gpg --verify' in mutt.
So you didn't cut and paste - you just hand processed each post.
I can't match your dedication to validating his posts - nor can I muster
your enthusiasm for defending them. I'll side with the others that find
them an unnecessary annoyance.
<snipped>
>
>> Because there's no chain of trust.
>
> Confirmed?
>(you've trimmed my initial investigation which indicates he
> has at least one signatory.)
"investigation"?
Huh?
How hard was it to see the key is signed by... the key holder (or
another person called Mika?), using a key that was signed... by (Mika).
That's *not* a chain of trust.
It's not even the issue.
More noise, no signal.
<snipped>
Regards
--
Iceweasel/Firefox/Chrome/Chromium/Iceape/IE extensions for finding
answers to questions about Debian:-
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/collections/Scott_Ferguson/debian/
Reply to: