On 09.04.2012 19:48, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote: > On 04/09/2012 12:11 PM, Mika Suomalainen wrote: >> On 09.04.2012 18:44, Camaleón wrote: >>> On Mon, 09 Apr 2012 18:04:13 +0300, Mika Suomalainen wrote: <...> > PGP/MIME just makes it easier for those that don't bother with the > signatures to ignore the attachment with the signature and not have to > deal with cutting it out in replies. The other issue I've seen with > inline vs PGP/MIME is that if the signature is not stripped out by > someone replying and including the signature in the quote it will > sometimes confuse the MUA. In most cases PGP/MIME won't have this issue > as the signature is a separate attachment and unless efforts are made to > include attachments in replies won't be included and even if it does it > still doesn't confuse the MUA. > > So if I was verifying my signature in that my latest message manually, I would need two files, which would be message and signature.asc and the verifying command would be "gpg --verify message signature.asc" (or were they swapped)? If we think that I am verifying the signature in my latest message, http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2012/04/msg00748.html , how would I get the message part of it? Or is just copy-pasting and saving it enough? (Or is it impossible? :)). -- Mika Suomalainen gpg --keyserver pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-keys 4DB53CFE82A46728 Key fingerprint = 24BC 1573 B8EE D666 D10A AA65 4DB5 3CFE 82A4 6728
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature