[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[OT] Manually verifying PGP/MIME signature with GPG



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

I am now asking this question for the third time, but now in separate
thread.

As this list seems to be against GPG INLINE signatures, I have
promised to move to S/MIME (with devices which support it) when
someone on this list tells me how do I manually verify PGP/MIME
signature in case email client cannot be used to do it. Example case
would be verifying message from mailing list archives. I will also
move to PGP/MIME if anyone on this list admits my point that it's
easier to verify GPG INLINE manually than PGP/MIME.

I have
1. Used 45 minutes to try to solve how to do it by myself.
2. I have Googled for this without finding anything useful.
3. I have asked at official GNUPG support channel and got only answer
that it's "tricky".

I am using PGP INLINE mainly, because of two reasons, which are
1. GPG INLINE is easier to verify manually. It's only copy-pasting the
whole message to gpg. I have sent three messages to this list asking
how does this happen with PGP/INLINE, but people are just ignoring the
question and telling me that I should use it.
2. K9 Mail, which I use on my phone when I sometimes need to email
from it, doesn't support PGP/MIME. There is bug report about it at
https://code.google.com/p/k9mail/issues/detail?id=13&colspec=ID%20Product%20Type%20Status%20Priority%20Milestone%20Owner%20Summary
.

- -- 
Mika Suomalainen
gpg --keyserver pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-keys 4DB53CFE82A46728
Key fingerprint = 24BC 1573 B8EE D666 D10A  AA65 4DB5 3CFE 82A4 6728
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=CMnA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: