Re: OT:change of mail provider
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 01.04.2012 12:30, richard wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Apr 2012 10:13:46 +0300 Mika Suomalainen
> <mika.henrik.mainio@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 01.04.2012 01:00, richard wrote:
>>> Hi, Now can I see my postings ???
>>>
>>> Please ignore
>>>
>>
>> Yes we can. But I think that somewhere read that you shouldn't
>> send testing of email addresses to this list.
>>
>> - -- Mika Suomalainen
>
>
> Mika as you have appointed yourself as a list policeman, please
> explain how I am to test on whether or not I am now able to see my
> first posting without send a post ?????
I don't know. You could ask return receipts, like I do.
By the way, the somewhere which I said in previous email is at
http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct .
> If you check in the archives you will find I raised the problem a
> while ago , wanting to know if it was the way debian lists are
> managed , and from that found my ISP was using gmail and blocking
> mail addressed back to the sender as a list posting does.
Ok.
> You have increased the bandwidth used with your huge sig block as
> well as the answer for me.
If I didn't sign emails which I send, there is no easy way to verify
that I have sent them. Email spoofing can be done with some clicks.
> OR WERE YOU JUST TROLLING ?
I am sorry, if you think that I am trolling. I don't mean to troll anyone.
- --
Mika Suomalainen
> gpg --keyserver pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-keys
> 4DB53CFE82A46728 Key fingerprint = 24BC 1573 B8EE D666 D10A AA65
> 4DB5 3CFE 82A4 6728
>> NOTE: The old key (62FE66853913CB03) expires on 03.04.2012!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=HX2j
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: