Re: "Gnome" package now requires installing "tracker"?
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:22:21 -0500, Tom H wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Camaleón <email@example.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:55:28 -0500, Tom H wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Camaleón <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:52:25 +0100, Claudius Hubig wrote:
>>>>> Given this enormous amount of dependencies, I really don’t think you
>>>>> can complain about tracker.
>>>> More than a complaint, I'd like to know why there exists such as
>>>> requirement "now". It was not just a few weeks ago.
>>> This requirement comes from upstream.
>> Any document to support that statement?
>> It will be indeed very sad to see that requirement coming from GNOME
> What I said (including what you snipped) is just from memory.
The cutted text was not related to the subject of the thread so I removed
> I don't care enough about this to google it... I was just trying to
> explain from where it was coming.
And from where it comes from?
I know what tracker does and how it works, this is not the main issue but
tracker as a hard requirement to have a full GNOME desktop. This is new.