Re: scsi device files not created when called for
Camaleón <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:06:40 +0100, Morten Bo Johansen wrote:
>> In the latter case, which package should I report against?
> I'd say "libsane".
I think I'll go for udev. Once the scanner is attached to to a
scsi device file, then the appropriate module should be loaded
and the files created.
>> Some info:
>> ~/ % uname -a
>> Linux gatsby 3.2.0-1-686-pae #1 SMP Sun Feb 5 23:52:49 UTC 2012 i686
>> package "udev" is version 175-3
> You're on sid, right?
It is a mixed testing/unstable system. Thanks for your attention.