Re: Re(4): POP3 in Debian
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: Re(4): POP3 in Debian
- From: Camaleón <email@example.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:41:58 +0000 (UTC)
- Message-id: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- References: <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com>
On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 15:05:46 -0700, peasthope wrote:
> From: Camaleon <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 11:31:35 +0000 (UTC)
>> So finally, what are you going to do or what are now your plans
>> regarding your original issue? :-?
> It was fixed last Thursday, January 19 shortly after Aoki rminded me to
> check with telnet. Documented in the second paragraph here.
> "http://carnot.yi.org/OberonPage.html#Mail" Editing and recompiling in
> less than 5 minutes.
Oh, I see. A bug at the MUA, then?
>> What I can tell is that editing the subject line can make some MUAs
>> (mostly webmails) break the threading style by removing the required
>> references and/or reply-to headers.
> Use mutt or Oberon. Instructions in
> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMailingLists pending.
Mmm, I'm not that confidence for Oberon but +1 for Mutt. Or better yet,
use a newsreader, it's the perfect transport protocol for dealing with
But now the hard part: convince people to ditch Gmail|Yahoo|Hotmail
webmail's in favor of Mutt or another decent MUA >>:-)