Re: RAID 1 - software or hardware.

To: Kelly Clowers <kelly.clowers@gmail.com>
Cc: debian-user <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: RAID 1 - software or hardware.
From: yudi v <yudi.tux@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 16:27:09 +1000
Message-id: <[🔎] CACo--muVPGE4zLf1zbha+5-akCwgPFLwKgKOqia0teFyNkPS-g@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] CAFoWM=_mYFDHQ+V4KaDO=+9pc+4Q0LhUPtmKxVE8VfamDrsf-A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] CACo--mvwUmkEfDWDbLBmJmPqxi47aN9E-x50S2M6QfbH64GkWQ@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] pan.2011.12.21.16.09.15@gmail.com> <[🔎] CACo--mvbaZkyDdab=mdE0-eJ-YPhzZeE_eiZjaPJS-eLijtQ-A@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] CAFoWM=_mYFDHQ+V4KaDO=+9pc+4Q0LhUPtmKxVE8VfamDrsf-A@mail.gmail.com>

Might be better to put LUKS on top of LVM instead of vice versa? Not sure.

By having LVM over LUKS, I will only have one container to unlock and from what I understand Debian cannot unlock several LUKS containers at start-up unlike Fedora.

My laptop currently has LVM over LUKS and works just fine except for suspend, which seems to fail intermittently.
--
Kind regards,
Yudi

Reply to:

References:
- RAID 1 - software or hardware.
  - From: yudi v <yudi.tux@gmail.com>
- Re: RAID 1 - software or hardware.
  - From: Camaleón <noelamac@gmail.com>
- Re: RAID 1 - software or hardware.
  - From: yudi v <yudi.tux@gmail.com>
- Re: RAID 1 - software or hardware.
  - From: Kelly Clowers <kelly.clowers@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: intel i5, system config question
Next by Date: Re: Going to 64bit
Previous by thread: Re: RAID 1 - software or hardware.
Next by thread: Re: RAID 1 - software or hardware.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread