Re: how to examine the wireless
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 2:48 AM, Camaleón <noelamac@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 01:51:02 +0800, lina wrote:
>
>>> Trouble with Macbook Pro 8,2 (broadcom 4331) and latest b43
>>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.wireless.general/81667
>>
>> thanks, I checked. the failure of probe of bcma0:0 and b43-phy0 ERROR:
>> FOUND UNSUPPORTED PHY (Analog 9, Type 7, Revision 1)
>>
>> was because I failed to find the proper firmware installer, right?
>> neither firmware-b43-installer nor firmware-b43-lpphy-installer is fit.
>>
>> at present
>
> To be sincere, I'm not sure. The user of that thread is also logging
> the same message although he seems to have loaded the proper firmware
> file.
>
> This is what he reports:
>
> ***
> [ 3281.316383] b43-phy0 ERROR: FOUND UNSUPPORTED PHY (Analog 9, Type 7, Revision 1)
> [ 3281.316391] b43: probe of bcma0:0 failed with error -95
> [ 3281.316417] Broadcom 43xx driver loaded [ Features: PMNLS, Firmware-ID: FW13 ]
> ***
>
>>> Besides, consider reporting your findings/problems at linuxwireless
>>> mailing list :-)
>
>> Thanks, I just subscribed. but at present still don't get a better
>> understanding about what's going on.
>
> (...)
>
> Me neither.
>
> The problem is that your only chance to get your wifi card running is by
> means of the b43 driver from kernel >3.2, at least for now because no
> other broadcom drivers seems to have support for it ;-(
Haha ... thanks
Just minutes ago I sent an email to the linuxwireless list (not sure
it's the exact list you recommended).
just repeated what we went through in this threads.
I did not make any progress in understanding this issue those days,
haha ... pretty occupied by other things.
>
> Greetings,
Best wishes,
>
> --
> Camaleón
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> Archive: [🔎] pan.2011.12.17.18.48.24@gmail.com">http://lists.debian.org/[🔎] pan.2011.12.17.18.48.24@gmail.com
>
Reply to: