On 2011-11-20, Hugo Vanwoerkom <hvw59601@care2.com> wrote: > > Ad hominem argument. Please. > The argument is and was that the locales idiocy is and was just that, an idiocy, so there is no ad hominem. She has no counter-argument. The rest is arm-chair psychology, I'll admit, but my _argument_ does not now nor has it ever resposed upon my evaluation of her psychological state.