Re: Is for this community XFCE the most common DE to replace GNOME 3?
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 11:51:08AM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Vi, 18 nov 11, 19:44:09, Stephen Allen wrote:
> >
> > You might try using Openbox. I run it without a desktop environment and it just
> > works. Even better without the overhead of LXDE.
>
> $ ps aux | grep -i lx
> amp 3151 0.0 0.0 4012 1392 tty1 S Nov15 0:00 /usr/bin/lxsession -s LXDE -e LXDE
> amp 3164 0.2 0.5 25700 11272 tty1 S Nov15 15:18 openbox --config-file /home/amp/.config/openbox/lxde-rc.xml
> amp 3166 1.5 3.3 167032 67984 tty1 S Nov15 80:14 lxpanel --profile LXDE
> amp 3174 0.0 0.4 102764 9040 tty1 S Nov15 0:00 pcmanfm --desktop --profile LXDE
> [manually deleted the 'grep lx' entry']
> $ uptime
> 11:38:36 up 3 days, 15:50, 7 users, load average: 0.07, 0.06, 0.08
>
> It seems lxpanel brings some "overhead" (at least compared to openbox),
> but it's probably due to the several applets (including a systray with
> other apps). I doubt however that it is significant for any other usage
> of LXDE than terminal multiplexer.
>
> Kind regards,
> Andrei
---end quoted text---
Might be more relevant if you removed LXDE entirely and installed openbox by itself. Then
compare the results of LXDE Desktop Environment vs Openbox Window Manager. ;)
Reply to: