Re: how to handle the not upgraded package
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Sven Joachim <svenjoac@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> As an unstable user, I beg to disagree. With aptitude there are few
> occasions where dist-upgrade is necessary, and it often does unwanted
> things. Unfortunately, apt-get does not have a safe-upgrade command.
(slight digression) I wish that the apt-get and aptitude developers
could harmonize their verbs so that we could have all three behaviors
in both apt-get and aptitude:
"[apt-get|aptitude] upgrade" would be the equivalent "apt-get upgrade"
"[apt-get|aptitude] full-upgrade" would be the equivalent of "aptitude
safe-upgrade"
"[apt-get|aptitude] dist-upgrade" would be the equivalent of "apt-get
dist-upgrade"/"aptitude full-upgrade"
I don't see in what way "apt-get diet-upgrade" and "aptitude
full-upgrade" differ. What am I missing?
Reply to: