Re: Running Password-gorilla on Debian SID after upgraded Debian from Squeeze
Bob Proulx <bob@proulx.com> writes:
> Csanyi Pal wrote:
>> >> The Password Gorilla requires the "pwsafe" package. This seems to
>> >> be an installation problem, as the pwsafe package ought to be part
>> >> of the Password Gorilla distribution.
>>...
>> and then I run password-gorilla but still get message abowe
>> mentioned.
> You confused me because you said "The Password Gorilla requires the
> "pwsafe" package." and I simply took you at your word. But the
> package installs okay. There is no pwsafe package in Debian and the
> Debian password-gorilla package does not require one.
I just wanted to say that that when I run password-gorilla then I get a
message box that gives me this message:
<quoted>
The Password Gorilla requires the "pwsafe" package. This seems to
be an installation problem, as the pwsafe package ought to be part
of the Password Gorilla distribution.
</quoted>
Sorry for this misunderstanding.
> Now more becomes clear. Not everything but more. You were not saying
> that you had seen that installing password-gorilla failed to install
> because it required a pwsafe package. You meant to say that when you
> ran password-gorrilla that it produced that message saying the above
> text. That is an important different!
Yes, I meant to say that.
> Look for any environment variable that may affect it. Likely
> candidates would contain TCL in their name. This command might
> produce some clues.
>
> $ env | grep TCL
This command produce not any message here.
> Try running with a clean environment. The 'env -i' command can do
> this by starting off a command with a clean environment.
>
> $ env -i PATH=/usr/bin:/bin HOME=$HOME DISPLAY=$DISPLAY password-gorilla
With this command I can run password-gorilla successfully.
> If the above works for you (it does for me) then there is a problem
> with an environment variable. Find it and fix it and you won't need
> the environment initialization cleaning anymore.
I shall find and fix it.
--
Regards, Pal
<http://cspl.me>
Reply to: