Re: OT questions about noscript and notscript
2011/8/19 Scott Ferguson <prettyfly.productions@gmail.com>:
> On 20/08/11 03:50, consul tores wrote:
>> 2011/8/18 Scott Ferguson <prettyfly.productions@gmail.com>:
>>> On 19/08/11 04:01, Paul E Condon wrote:
>>>> I'm curious about the differences between noscript and notscript.
>
> <snipped>
>
>>>
>>
>> Some people think that both, could be a security risk, because they
>> run under java, Is not it?
>>
>>
> Wow! You don't half like to load and sophist-i-cate a question do you? :-D
I do not understand what you say, but it could be assumed as a joke,
by convenience.
> Noscript does not run "under" Java.
Well, If you say that, I can not confirm it, but read this:
http://adblockplus.org/blog/attention-noscript-users
http://news.slashdot.org/story/09/05/01/236248/NoScript-Adds-Subscriptions-To-Adblock-Plus
http://forums.informaction.com/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=126
I am not a programer, then i trust Debian developers and maintainers,
but it reading information some things seem real.
> People *can* be a security risk, but not necessarily because they run
> under java.
>
> I would not trust people who ran under flash.
>
> Cheers
Reply to: