On Fri, 05 Aug 2011 10:10:47 -0500, John Hasler wrote: > Tong writes: >> Thanks for the hint, Darac. Found it's source. FYI, the geographical >> info can be at the state/province level. > > Note that, while useful, this data is not reliable. Yes, lots of gaps it seems. I've had a look at it, and my data (even though no apparently no longer updated; see my other post in this thread) seems more reliable at the moment.