Re: message formatting and pseudo XML [was Re: disk problems: which ATA?]
On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 03:56:30PM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-07-03 at 23:40 +0100, Lisi wrote:
> > On Sunday 03 July 2011 22:35:08 Ross Boylan wrote:
> > > (see original message)
> > Not a very productive instruction to those of us who have HTML display turned
> > off.
> > Lisi
> That's interesting. The messages are not in html. However, I did use a
> little pseudo-XML (with angle brackets--I'm deliberately not repeating
> it here) to distinguish material I copied from the terminal.
> I haven't noticed problems in evolution, mutt, or thunderbird.
> Any opinions from anyone on whether pseudo-XML is inadvisable?
I don't even know what pseudo-XML is, but your message was clearly
displayed for me (with indentations, without raw markup) by mutt with
a more-or-less default configuration.