Re: There was a problem with your email to debianHELP
- To: "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Subject: Re: There was a problem with your email to debianHELP
- From: Chris Brennan <email@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 21:20:09 -0400
- Message-id: <BANLkTi=71S4XtXR+4TEm+DL1fejA3WUtoA@mail.gmail.com>
- In-reply-to: <20110602010537.GB20702@slimer>
- References: <1306886234.2002.10.camel@debian> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <20110601174631.GT22448@think.nuvreauspam> <1306962285.2034.9.camel@debian> <BANLkTi=c2u2ZTimu6Nz_-A4ksjK6whnOuw@mail.gmail.com> <20110602010537.GB20702@slimer>
On Wednesday, June 1, 2011, William Hopkins <email@example.com> wrote:
> On 06/01/11 at 06:46pm, Chris Brennan wrote:
>> While I suspect the answer to this is no, does gmail have a feature such as
>> this? All I see now is reply/forward/reply-all, but no group reply...
> Not that I know of. But of course, you can use gmail with any number of clients which do support it.
I used a client (thunderbird) for years with gmail (goolge for domains
actually) and I found it cumbersome at best and the client eventually
got slow. I've also grown rather accustomed to flails interface, I do
realize some people like it Ne some don't, I do. I also realize that
with the ten+ mailing lists I am on, there are some features that are
In retrospect, maybe I should just learn to use fetchmail, procmail
and mutt (or maybe some other mta and fetch my mail to one of my local
servers and read it via samba or nfs. That said, are there any jostle
to setup fetchmail, procmail and an mta/mua for local use?
> A: Yes.
> >Q: Are you sure?
> >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
> >>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?