On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 03:35:50PM +0100, Lisi wrote: > On Monday 16 May 2011 21:18:01 Andrei Popescu wrote: > > On Lu, 16 mai 11, 20:43:37, Lisi wrote: > > > Vanilla, and untouched by human hand. Exactly as aptitude/debian set it > > > up! I have never dared touch my preferences file..... > > > > [...] > > > > > 200 http://backports.debian.org lenny-backports/non-free Packages > > > release o=Debian Backports,a=lenny-backports,l=Debian > > > Backports,c=non-free > > > origin backports.debian.org > > > 200 http://backports.debian.org lenny-backports/contrib Packages > > > release o=Debian Backports,a=lenny-backports,l=Debian > > > Backports,c=contrib origin backports.debian.org > > > 200 http://backports.debian.org lenny-backports/main Packages > > > release o=Debian Backports,a=lenny-backports,l=Debian > > > Backports,c=main origin backports.debian.org > > > > backports.d.o has priority 200, while on a squeeze machine it gets only > > 100. You should inspect /etc/apt/preferences and the contents of > > /etc/apt/preferences.d/ (if any of these exist). > > /etc/apt/preferences exists and /etc/apt/preferences.d/ does not. But I am > not clear as to the purpose of looking at them? > > For what it is worth, /ect/apt/preferences says: > <quote> > Package: * > Pin: release a=lenny-backports > Pin-Priority: 200 > </quote> > It agrees with apt-cache policy. Shouldn't it? I seem to remember reaading that the pin-priority for backports should be 100. That's what "apt-cache policy" shows on my system (squeeze). -- Bob Holtzman If you think you're getting free lunch, chech the price of the beer. Key ID: 8D549279
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature