Re: Why doesn't debian remove the proprietary software from it's servers?
My list is rather ironic, no?
$ aptitude search '~s"non-free|contrib"~i!~M'
i bluez-firmware - Firmware for
Bluetooth devices
i emacs23-common-non-dfsg - GNU Emacs shared,
architecture independent, non-DFSG items
i flashplugin-nonfree - Adobe Flash Player
- browser plugin
i sun-java6-bin - Sun Java(TM)
Runtime Environment (JRE) 6 (architecture dep
i sun-java6-jre - Sun Java(TM)
Runtime Environment (JRE) 6 (architecture ind
i sun-java6-plugin - The Java(TM)
Plug-in, Java SE 6
i unrar - Unarchiver for
.rar files (non-free version)
i w32codecs - win32 binary
codecs
I probably don't need the ww32codecs and the bluez-firmware. The
emacs23-common-non-dfsg is rather ironic. Even FSF distributed code
isn't always DSFG free. Perhaps the FSF ought to be sure their packages
meet the DFSG before throwing stones. That said, I have a basic
understanding of the difference and each project's stand on the matter.
- Nate >>
--
"The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all
possible worlds. The pessimist fears this is true."
Ham radio, Linux, bikes, and more: http://www.n0nb.us
Reply to: