[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: file systems



On 04/19/2011 03:18 PM, Klistvud wrote:
Dne, 19. 04. 2011 20:45:38 je prad napisal(a):
we are thinking of redoing our existing servers and workstations in
june. our servers is low volume and run out of our home via cable.

right now the servers are running freebsd and our personal machines use
arch linux, but we'd like to unify everything onto debian because
a) we've liked it in the past
b) we like the social contract
c) we appreciate the no-nonsense attitude about 'free'

we are contemplating the fs to use:
ext4 (which we've used for a couple of years)
zfs (we've heard this is really good)
btrfs (ditto - though it's still 'new' and 'lacking' features)

are there any feelings or recommendations regarding the above?


Btrfs is as yet an experimental filesystem and not recommended for any serious use whatsoever even by its creator/developer, Ted Ts'o.

Zfs is, AFAIK, a filesystem in userspace (in GNU/Linux). Which probably means it's slow (among other things). Hardly for production use.

Of the three, ext4 is your only realistic option. Which I suppose you already knew? You just wanted confirmation, right?

If it makes any difference to you, I _think_ that there's a windows program that will read ext3; I know it will read ext2. I haven't heard of one that reads ext4. If you don't care about windows, ext4 seems to work fine. (You can read the windows directories from Linux and even cop;y to them, just not the other way around.)

--doug

--doug

--
Blessed are the peacemakers...for they shall be shot at from both sides. --A. M. Greeley


Reply to: