On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 10:04:12AM -0500, Chris Brennan wrote: > On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 7:27 AM, Andrei Popescu <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> wrote: > > AFAIK this is the 64bit version. I had no issues with it, but I'm not a > > heavy flash user. > > > > > ia32 =! ia64 nor is it amd64 ... it is Intel Architecture, 32-bit. So where > did you get 64bit from that? or are you implying that the 32bit version of > flash ran in a 64bit environment? The command, which you deleted from your reply, checks the dependencies of flashplugin-nonfree for any occurence of ia32. This failed to return any results, so it can be presumed that it has no 32-bit dependencies, therefore it is likely to be a 64-bit app. Cheers, Tom -- A diplomat is a person who can tell you to go to hell in such a way that you actually look forward to the trip. -- Caskie Stinnett, "Out of the Red"
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature