Re: Please ignore this test.

[Hugo Vanwoerkom <hvw59601@care2.com>]

Patrick Ouellette wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 11:54:53AM -0600, Cybe R. Wizard wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:34:23 +0100
> > Klistvud <quotations@aliceadsl.fr> wrote:
> >
> > > Dne, 12. 01. 2011 17:23:27 je François TOURDE napisal(a):
> > > > Le 14986ième jour après Epoch,
> > > > Klistvud écrivait:
> > > >
> > > > > Dne, 12. 01. 2011 14:07:53 je Kleene, Nancy (kleenenl) napisal(a):
> > > > > > Please ignore this test.
> > > > > Ignoring.
> > > > >
> > > > > Please ignore this reply.
> > > > Should we ignore you've replied, or should we ignore that you've  
> > > > ignored
> > > > the first msg?
> > > >
> > > > It's confusing ;) ... Oh, ignore it :P
> > > Well, replying to your question wouldn't be ignoring, now, would it?
> > >
> > > So, I'll just keep ignoring.
> > This thread has become 'ignore' rant.
>
> If a thread is posted to a listserv, and everyone ignores it, does
> Godwin's law apply?

only to 'ignore' rant Nazis.