Re: Attaching vs. pastebin for big outputs [was: Re: Installation Size Different - bug ?]

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Attaching vs. pastebin for big outputs [was: Re: Installation Size Different - bug ?]
From: Lisi <lisi.reisz@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 09:26:45 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] 201011300926.45161.lisi.reisz@gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] pan.2010.11.01.11.26.40@gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTi=pQXOuH7HEp6yE0wq7Zx_V9W_V5JE4AvuL5G0a@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20101101103001.GD3365@think.homelan> <[🔎] pan.2010.11.01.11.26.40@gmail.com>

On Monday 01 November 2010 11:26:40 Camaleón wrote:
> if the user does not have Internet access,
> embedded those inside the e-mail is right

Camaleón, how does said user send emails if he does not have Internet access?

Lisi

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Attaching vs. pastebin for big outputs [was: Re: Installation Size Different - bug ?]
  - From: Camaleón <noelamac@gmail.com>

References:
- Attaching vs. pastebin for big outputs [was: Re: Installation Size Different - bug ?]
  - From: Andrei Popescu <andreimpopescu@gmail.com>
- Re: Attaching vs. pastebin for big outputs [was: Re: Installation Size Different - bug ?]
  - From: Camaleón <noelamac@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: /etc/grub.d/10_linux anomaly
Next by Date: Re: /etc/grub.d/10_linux anomaly
Previous by thread: Re: Attaching vs. pastebin for big outputs
Next by thread: Re: Attaching vs. pastebin for big outputs [was: Re: Installation Size Different - bug ?]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread