Re: shouldn't apt-get upgrade, you know, upgrade ?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: shouldn't apt-get upgrade, you know, upgrade ?
From: Sven Joachim <svenjoac@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 07:27:54 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 87sk79kv51.fsf@turtle.gmx.de>
Mail-followup-to: debian-user@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20100406051248.GV11367@esterhazy> (Brian Ryans's message of "Tue, 6 Apr 2010 00:12:48 -0500")
References: <[🔎] 20100405213737.0656411a@windy.deldotd.com> <[🔎] hpeeit$r0a$1@dough.gmane.org> <[🔎] 20100406051248.GV11367@esterhazy>

On 2010-04-06 07:12 +0200, Brian Ryans wrote:

> Quoting Johan Grönqvist on 2010-04-05 23:50:37:
>>
>> I think you may be interested in the dist-upgrade command instead.
>
> Now called full-upgrade (though dist-upgrade remains for backcompat).
> upgrade is now safe-upgrade.

This is true for aptitude but not for apt-get.

Sven

Reply to:

References:
- shouldn't apt-get upgrade, you know, upgrade ?
  - From: <briand@aracnet.com>
- Re: shouldn't apt-get upgrade, you know, upgrade ?
  - From: Johan Grönqvist <johan.gronqvist@gmail.com>
- Re: shouldn't apt-get upgrade, you know, upgrade ?
  - From: Brian Ryans <brian.l.ryans@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: How to list packages in various priorities or sections
Next by Date: Re: Debian And Advanced Layer3 9924T
Previous by thread: Re: shouldn't apt-get upgrade, you know, upgrade ?
Next by thread: Re: shouldn't apt-get upgrade, you know, upgrade ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread