Re: shouldn't apt-get upgrade, you know, upgrade ?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: shouldn't apt-get upgrade, you know, upgrade ?
From: Brian Ryans <brian.l.ryans@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 00:12:48 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 20100406051248.GV11367@esterhazy>
Mail-followup-to: debian-user@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] hpeeit$r0a$1@dough.gmane.org>
References: <[🔎] 20100405213737.0656411a@windy.deldotd.com> <[🔎] hpeeit$r0a$1@dough.gmane.org>

Quoting Johan Grönqvist on 2010-04-05 23:50:37:
>
> I think you may be interested in the dist-upgrade command instead.

Now called full-upgrade (though dist-upgrade remains for backcompat).
upgrade is now safe-upgrade.

-- 
 _  Brian Ryans 8B2A 54C4 E275 8CFD 8A7D 5D0B 0AD0 B014 C112 13D0     .
( ) ICQ UIN: 43190205 | Mail/MSN/Jabber: BrianLRyans@gmail.com       ..:
 X  ASCII Ribbon Campaign Against HTML mail and v-cards: asciiribbon.org
/ \ Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: shouldn't apt-get upgrade, you know, upgrade ?
  - From: Sven Joachim <svenjoac@gmx.de>

References:
- shouldn't apt-get upgrade, you know, upgrade ?
  - From: <briand@aracnet.com>
- Re: shouldn't apt-get upgrade, you know, upgrade ?
  - From: Johan Grönqvist <johan.gronqvist@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: shouldn't apt-get upgrade, you know, upgrade ?
Next by Date: Re: How to list packages in various priorities or sections
Previous by thread: Re: shouldn't apt-get upgrade, you know, upgrade ?
Next by thread: Re: shouldn't apt-get upgrade, you know, upgrade ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread